Helper Appliction Problem

Post by **Toguno** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:28 am

Porkkana wrote:People that are over 18 can be very immature and people that are 10 can be very mature. Age is just a number and maturity is something deeper.

If anything, wouldnt people over 18 be more mature?
I happen to think that the rule shoouldnt be a rule, just a notification. This is becuase I have seen a mature 10 year old (Cough not naming).For example, on the bottom or top of the template it says: "If you are under the age of 13 your application may have a smaller chance of getting accepted" or something like that. However, applications shouldnt get immediatly denied because of a player younger then thirteen. Just my opinion.

Post by **amp** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:26 pm

toguno wrote:
If anything, wouldnt people over 18 be more mature?
I happen to think that the rule shoouldnt be a rule, just a notification. This is becuase I have seen a mature 10 year old (Cough not naming).For example, on the bottom or top of the template it says: "If you are under the age of 13 your application may have a smaller chance of getting accepted" or something like that. However, applications shouldnt get immediatly denied because of a player younger then thirteen. Just my opinion.

Agreed; people can be mature for their age. Staff usually looks to older players (17ish), but people must forget that I was only 14 and 1/4 when I got mod. Younger people COULD be mature enough, but that is generally not the case.

Post by **FallOutAdam** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:31 pm

I am 13, but I am really mature. Sort of bad though, as people call me boring for my age... -.-

Post by **amp** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:08 pm

Crash wrote:I am 13, but I am really mature. Sort of bad though, as people call me boring for my age... -.-

I was mature as a moderator (well, mature enough for the most part), and I'm never called boring. I'm like the life of the freakin' party most of the time...
Just because ya young, doesn't mean your dumb as dirt, and act like ya 5.

Post by **Bob** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:03 pm

Crash wrote:I am 13, but I am really mature. Sort of bad though, as people call me boring for my age... -.-

You're not mature, silly boiii

Post by **amp** » Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:50 pm

Bob wrote:
Crash wrote:I am 13, but I am really mature. Sort of bad though, as people call me boring for my age... -.-
You're not mature, silly boiii

He's fairly mature. Definitely more mature than you.

Post by **Bob** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:17 am

Chance wrote:
Bob wrote:
Crash wrote:I am 13, but I am really mature. Sort of bad though, as people call me boring for my age... -.-
You're not mature, silly boiii
He's fairly mature. Definitely more mature than you.

Of course more mature than me. I'm silly

Post by **nickmcski** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:41 am

Well another reason why we have a age limit is we want to protect staff, especially young ones. For example moderators and admins have a GUI to see every painting ever loaded. And it's not uncommon to come across a vulgar painting while working through the list

Post by **amp** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:55 am

nickmcski wrote:Well another reason why we have a age limit is we want to protect staff, especially young ones. For example moderators and admins have a GUI to see every painting ever loaded. And it's not uncommon to come across a vulgar painting while working through the list

That's a very good point; though the Admin GUI is only for mods and admins, not helpers.

Post by **Handyman** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 6:56 am

Just stop this post, the age requirement/advise stays the way as it is.

Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Re: Helper Appliction Problem

Who is online